Wednesday, May 6, 2009

CONFIDENCE


First of all I want to share my opinion about confidence….confidence doesn’t mean to start dancing infront of peoples or take the phone number of a girl\boy or start talking to a complete stranger…it is not confidence IT IS BOLDNESS .. what confidence really mean is to stay calm at critical situation & to prove YOURSELF to YOURSELF & to this WORLD that you can do everything, not to get discourage after a failure but to try again and again until you get your desired results…

Now lets get back to topic HOW CAN WE BECOME CONFIDENT PERSON actually it all depends on us wether we realize it now or after 10 years. The process or should I say THE WAY is very easy .. JUST BE YOURSELF STOP COPYING OTHERS .. recognize your worth don’t take shit if someone doesn’t recognize your worth its his/her lost why do you need to take tension ? just chill and relax .. replace hate and bad memories by setting new goals in your life by setting new goals add new words like ‘ I CAN , I WILL , I MUST in your life dictionary and don’t forget to discard old words like ‘ I MIGHT , I THINK , I OUGHT ‘ ..

I have an example of an advertise of a drink DEW in which a person said ‘ urhna chahta tha hamesha say loog kehtay thay nahi hosakta …raasta mushkil tha laikin main koshish karta raha agay barhta raha aur main nay jaanlia kay jo loog kehtay hain k nahi hosakta who mujhey jaantay nahi ‘ the main thing which counts is self recognition if you find yourself in you than nothing will make you backdown…try to be optimistic don’t tell your God how big your problem is..just tell your problem how big your God is …..

Remember confidence is gain from 4 things :

  1. Self trust : only I can do this job .
  2. Hope : everything will gonna be fine even the diamond suffer the pain of heat.
  3. Hard work : the more I work hard , the more fast I will reach my destiny .
  4. Faith : keep your faith strong on GOD that no matter what happen he is with you .

Before ending I want to share share some quotations from the movie LORD OF THE RING :

  • All that glitter is not gold.
  • Not all who wander are lost
  • The old that is strong doest not wither
  • Deep roots are not reached by frost
  • From the ashes a fire shall be woken
  • A light from the shadow shall spring
  • Renewed shall be blade that was broken
  • The crownless again shall be king

REMEMBER NOTHING IN THIS WORLD IS IMPOSSIBLE EVEN THE IMPOSSIBLE ITSELF SAY’S I M POSSIBLE ..

Brass Tacks: Zaid Hamid


alliburton after the CFO of the energy company met with BOA officials. So by one degree of separation, isn’t Brass Tacks, the company of Zaid Hamid, linked to Halliburton because of the BOA connection?

Now I want to clarify that all the above facts are true, but I do not believe in the yarn I wind around them to make them connect. I do not believe for a second that Zaid Hamid intends to create fear and profit from it. He just happened to be a security expert who landed on TV with a pre-existing business and started preaching his prejudices derived from random conspiracy theories. I wrote the scenario above to illustrate how the coincidental can be woven together to make a compelling narrative that has no real truth, nor is it causal or correlated. It is thinking like this that I wish Zaid Hamid would question himself on, because as demonstrated above even he could fall prey to the world where nothing is substantiated and the dicey is used as truth to fan hatred.

As far as profiting from concerns he preaches against, well that’s for him to resolve. But the absolutism that Zaid Hamid holds others to, he does not hold himself to apparently.

This absolutism is not just moral in his case, it is intellectual as well. In his recent programme, he described how income taxes were one of the greatest conspiracies of the US. Had he just bothered to look into the system of income taxes and public finance, he would have realized that a progressive taxation system is one of the greatest tools to redistribute wealth and to help the poor. Accidents of birth, talent and intelligence can be mitigated into a more just society when there is a documented tax base, and societies can pay for services to the economically disadvantaged. A progressive taxation system can make sure that there are good hospitals, schools, pensions and other benefits that can help them overturn an unequal society by redistributing from the rich to the poor. The welfare state that all populist Islamic leaders promise will be based on the progressive income tax system, not government sales tax (GST). If we had no income taxes, and only GST then we would be taxing consumption, and for the poor food is a large part of that, which means relative to income no income taxes and only GST; it would penalize the poor more than the rich and they would eat less. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

For example, Zaid Hamid has been insinuating for the longest time that most of Pakistan’s leaders are in the pockets of the CIA. I am sure some are. However, Zaid Hamid makes one exclusion to his thesis, General Musharraf, someone who overtly cooperated more with the US than anyone else in Pakistan’s history. Now exactly how Zaid Hamid has the knowledge to make this distinction, no one knows. By continuously insisting on television the he is the only one who knows these things, he is creating the cult of personality, not that of objectivity. After all, this is a man who decries the state of representative politics, of democracy, but that does not mean he has the right to do away with it, because the only alternative in his eyes would be someone he approves of (himself?), not who the people choose.

In the end, I would like to add a few cautionary notes. Brass Tacks is not a programme entirely without merit, and neither is Zaid Hamid. For example, he is right when he discusses the rancid imperialism of the US and its misadventures abroad, he is right when he believes that unfettered capitalism is bad, or that Muslims need to awaken from their slumber. He is right when he mentions there are flaws in an economic system that allows for hot money, that sells credit irresponsibly for mindless consumption. These are legitimate themes, and the fact that Zaid Hamid is non-sectarian is applause worthy.

But where Zaid Hamid should draw the line is upholding the facts that withstand query, abstaining from hate speech even if he opposes large swathes of humanity and verifying tracts that may not fit into his presuppositions. There is a place for both the right and left on television, after all that is what creates consensus through dialectic. What should be common is remembering Islam is a religion of peace.

Abdul Aziz: Land Grabber or Religious Activist?


There is nothing exceptional about Maulana Abdul Aziz, the firebrand cleric of Islamabad's famous Lal Masjid (red mosque). Slim and slender Abdul Aziz looks more like a foot soldier rather than a leader of an extremist group which has decided to take on the might of the Pakistani state. Nor has he any outstanding educational qualifications. He is simply a graduate of a Pakistani Madrassah where he studied the customary Dars-e-Nizami, which is taught at the most elementary level of religious education in Pakistan.

However during the last two months he has eclipsed every other religious and political leader of the country. The way Pakistani and international media have been covering every word Abdul Aziz utters in public makes the most high profile figures in Pakistani politics envious.

Tensions between the government and religious students led by Abdul Aziz have been ongoing for the last three months over the demolition of illegally constructed mosques. However, Islamabad was shaken out of its political
stupor by the female students and teachers of the seminary in the last week of March.

They announced the launch of a moral crusade against all "immoral activities" in the federal capital. Coming on the heels of these actions by the female students was the announcement by the cleric Abdul Aziz for the establishment of a parallel court system, which would punish perpetrators of moral crimes in the federal capital. He issued a one month ultimatum from his pulpit to the government to clean Islamabad of all "immoral activities."

He also warned the government in clear words that his students could resort to suicide attacks in the case of a violent police operation launched against the seminary. "If the government fails to eradicate all these moral evils from the society within the specified period of one month the students of the seminary would themselves take actions against all the people involved in such activities," said Maulana Abdul Aziz while addressing Friday Prayer congregation at Lal Masjid.

In his speech the cleric identified liquor, drugs, music, feature movies and photographs of women displayed in public places as the moral evils against which he has decided to launch a crusade.

The female students of the seminary assisted by the male students raided an alleged brothel, kidnapped three women from there and held them hostage for three days before releasing them after securing confessional statements saying that there were involved in "immoral activities." All this happened under the watchful eyes of Pakistani and international media. The extraordinary coverage given to the activities of religious students have made Abdul Aziz an instant celebrity not only within the country but in the world outside as well.

There are around 7,000 students studying in the male and female sections of the religious seminary, of which Abdul Aziz is the principal. "We know from the reports that 70 percent of the students are from tribal areas," senior officials of the Islamabad administration said. This makes the situation sensitive as Pakistani security forces are already engaged in bloody military operations against militants in the tribal areas of Pakistan close to its western border with Afghanistan.

Initially the religious students restricted their activities to protests against the government campaign to demolish illegally constructed mosques in Islamabad. The protests continued for a month and the students claimed victory when a federal government minister, Ijaz-ul-Haq, son of the last military ruler of Pakistan, General Zia-ul-Haq, participated in the foundation laying ceremony of one of the demolished mosques in Islamabad.

Since then the students feel more comfortable with their activities. Later the religious students -- both male and female -- along with their teachers started visiting video and music shops in Islamabad and threatening the owners to close down their businesses or face dire consequences.

Abdul Aziz remained in the background until the time he issued a warning to the government that any police operation against the religious seminary could compel the students to carry out suicide attacks in the country. Before this statement it was the female religious students of the seminary, attached to the mosque, who were spearheading the campaign to enforce Islamic law in the federal capital territory. However, the cleric's statement suddenly eclipsed all others. Now he seems to be giving the impression that he is in command. He is seen as someone who is taking the law into his hands and challenging the writ of the government.

However, he thinks that the strict observance of religious law is the only path to salvation for the people of Pakistan. Though he is full of appreciation for the Taliban of neighboring Afghanistan, he seems to be taking inspiration
from the Islamic movement of religious students of Indonesia, who, according to him, independently enforced Islamic law in the 53 districts of Indonesia and "banned music and dancing there."

Not surprisingly Abdul Aziz's acts created a scare among the residents of Islamabad, as the rumor started spreading in the city that religious students would attack women with uncovered faces. These fears were reinforced by the
groups of religious students visiting video and music shops in Islamabad threatening them with dire consequences if they didn't close down their businesses.

After coming face to face with this extraordinary situation the government and the local administration of Islamabad started sending religious scholars to Lal-Masjid to convince Abdul Aziz to back down. The government even managed to send one of the teachers of Abdul Aziz to meet and convince him to refrain from flouting the law. But he won't listen to anybody.

"We are striving to enforce Islamic law in the society. We say the state of Pakistan belongs to Allah. Sovereignty belongs to Allah," he said in Friday prayers

Abdul Aziz, 46, is barely recognized as a religious scholar by his contemporaries. Interestingly, the mainstream religious political parties are maintaining a distance from the action of Abdul Aziz and his followers.
One prominent religious political leader, Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehmen, termed the action of the fundamentalist group as "insanity."

Abdul Aziz served as officially designated prayer leader in government constructed and owned Lal-Masjid until 2005 when he was dismissed from service after he issued a "fatwa" (religious decree) against the army officers who were fighting against Pakistani Taliban in the tribal areas close to the Afghan border. In the fatwa he declared that none of the army officers who got killed in the fighting in tribal area was a martyr and religious sanctions were not available for their funeral.

"His fatwa irked the government and he was dismissed from service since then he has been illegally occupying Lal-Masjid," said a government official.

Abdul Aziz's father, Maulana Abdullah was a much better known figure in the religious circles of Pakistan. Abdullah, who was killed during the sectarian strife in the 1990s, was the first prayer leader of Lal-Masjid.

"Pakistan's last military ruler, General Zia-ul-Haq, was said to be very close to Maulana Abdullah, who was famous for his speeches on jihad," said a senior journalist familiar with the political history of Pakistan.

According to family sources Abdul Aziz came to Islamabad as a six-year-old boy from his home town in Balochistan, when his father was appointed Khatib (prayer leader) of Lal-Masjid in 1966. "He has grown up in the liberal atmosphere of Islamabad but at a time when his father was a poor man. Later his family became affluent and he was sent to Karachi to study in the most renowned religious seminary after studying for few years in a public school," said a journalist who was a friend to Abdul Aziz's father.

The followers of Abdul Aziz like to compare him to the one-eyed supreme leader of the Taliban, Mullah Omar. Just like Mullah Omar, Abdul Aziz is a recluse who can react violently at any attempt to photograph him. His followers said that Abdul Aziz was angry to see his photographs in the next day's newspapers after he announced the suicide bombings in Islamabad during the Friday prayers last week.

Senior citizens of Islamabad still vividly remember the strong speeches on jihad Abdu Aziz's father used to deliver from his pulpit in Lal-Masjid. This was during the 1980s when the mujahideen's fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was at its peak. This gave a chance to Abdul Aziz and his brother Abdul Rashid Ghazi to interact with the Afghan Mujahideen and their Pakistani partners in jihad.

Even now the government officials say that Abdul Aziz is surrounded by the activists of a banned extremist organization Jasiah-e-Muhammad (Army of Muhammad) who are acting as his main advisers. Lal Masjid was a regular meeting place for the leaders of banned militant organizations until recently. The two brothers claim to have close contact with the leadership of militant organizations that the Musharraf government banned as part of a crackdown on extremist organizations in the wake of Sept. 11.

"We have confirmed information that there are a number of wanted men inside the precincts of Lal Masjid and associated Madrassah of Jamia Hafsa and whatever
Abdul Aziz is doing he is taking advice from these people who are wanted for a number of terrorism related activities in the country," said a senior government official.

Abdul Aziz is himself a wanted man and was declared a proclaimed offender in a number of cases two years ago. "I have not been out of the precincts of Mosque during the last two years, I know they will arrest me if I go out of
the mosque," said Abdul Aziz.

Abdul Aziz was in the news headlines when in July 2005 Pakistani security forces tried to raid the mosque following the suicide bombings that month in London. At that time baton-wielding female students of the madrassah protected him from Pakistani security forces.

"We were met by baton wielding women who refused to let us enter the mosque or seminary when we went their search the precincts and arrest some of the wanted people," said a senior security official.

Lal Masjid is located near the headquarters of Pakistan's powerful ISI, military intelligence service, which helped train and fund the holy warriors, and a number of ISI staff are said to go there for prayers. Throughout most of its existence, the Lal Masjid has long been favored by the city elite, including prime ministers, army chiefs and presidents.

The impunity with which this new fundamentalist group is pursuing its agenda has led many observers to believe that Abdul Aziz and his baton-wielding female students have the support of some powerful segment of Pakistan's government. Abdul Aziz doesn't deny this. He always tells visiting journalists that a lot of people from the administration and police are coming to them and extending secret support.

"We have examples from history, for instance Prophet Moses grew up in the home of Pharaoh. So I think that God is directly using the religious students for a good cause. We don't have any connection with the influential people within the government. But the relatives of some of our students are influential people and they have conveyed to us that what we are doing is right," he said.

However this is not the only reason why people think that that the fundamentalist group enjoys the backing of powerful people from within the government. The precision and dexterity with which Abdul Aziz and his brigade
of female students have so far handled the so-called movement to enforce Islamic law in the country has compelled many analysts to believe that there is a mastermind pulling the strings from behind the scenes.

Most of the senior journalists agree that the group has managed the media very skillfully and has defeated the government on this front at least. However, Abdul Aziz is hardly a genius who could have supervised the media campaign of the movement. When this reporter reached Jamia Hafsa to interview Abdul Aziz, his media savvy younger brother, Abdul Rashid Ghazi asked that the interview be cleared by him before publication as Abdul Aziz was not familiar with the tricks of handling the media. "Kindly get it cleared from me before you publish it because Maulana Abdul Aziz sometimes says things which are not acceptable in the society, because he is too straightforward," Abdul Rashid Ghazi asked me.

Ghazi even clarified to the media that his brother had not vowed to launch suicide attacks and was misquoted by the media. "What happened was that some of the students approached Maulana Abdul Aziz for permission to launch suicide attacks against the government in case there is a police operation, he denied to grant permission to the students, though he warned the government that things could head in this direction if there is a use of force," Abdul Rashid Ghazi clarified in an interview with a television channel.

However, in an interview with this reporter Abdul Aziz insisted on his initial statement and repeated what he said while addressing the Friday prayers last week. "If there is a violent operation then we will consider suicide
attacks. We want a peaceful change in the society although I know that revolutions are always violent," he said. In his assertions the threats of suicide attacks in Islamabad are always followed by praises for Taliban and al-Qaida and other militant organizations. "We love the Taliban and al-Qaida, they are the one spreading the message of Jihad in the Muslim world, we love them," said Abdul Aziz.

However there are many in Islamabad who see Maulana Abdulaziz as a petty land grabber. After all, the ongoing tensions between the government and the Abdul Aziz-led seminary started three months back when the Islamabad
administration issued notices to Jamia Hafsa administration for illegally constructing the building of the seminary on a valuable government owned land. Again the baton-wielding female students of the seminary obstructed the Islamabad administration's attempt to demolish the building. The administration officials said that they had served more than 20 notices to the administration of Jamia Hafsa for illegal construction. "But [what] we get in return are threats and public display of force," said a senior official of the Islamabad administration.

For Abdul Aziz there is always a religious dimension to any issue that confronts him. "The land belongs to Allah and if government does nothing to facilitate the construction of religious educational institutions than it is the duty of religious scholars to come forward and build the seminary on government owned land," said Abdul Aziz.

Seeds of rebellion

Look into the seeds of time and you shall get the answers you seek. Pakistan's history doesn't lie; our leaders lie. They continue their yarns as the nation of 176 million face death, disintegration and disaster. Chivalrous chatter straddling out of the presidency and the Prime Minister's House leave us cynically cold. The PPP and ANP information ministers manufacture messy fluff about the Taliban.

Gecko-like their statements take new hue each day. They want us to believe it. Even the words of our army chief and his generals cause small comfort. Rebellion is in the air and our rulers sit in their imperial fortresses playing dumb charades with dozen-a-day foreign interlocutors who come to chastise them. Our land, our space, our national news has been invaded by foreign VIPs and the Taliban alike. The scenes and statements are getting sickeningly repetitive.

And then you have to listen to the baloney of two Baloch emigre singling out Punjab as their enemy. Kill one Punjabi a day shouts Brahamdagh Khan Bugti hiding in Kabul; while Hyrbyair Marri demands an independent Balochistan. Amidst their call to arms and ethnic purging, descends a lady in white with diamonds and Swiss lace. She's come all the way from Kalat to apprise our prime minister on affairs of Balochistan. How bizarre? Begum Khan of Kalat is photographed in all her majesty briefing all-ears-and-eyes Gilani at the PM House. ‘Sab theek hai' is the conclusion both must have drawn. Can someone explain the jaw dropping seditious statements from Bugti and Marri? Or should we trash them as talk by two 'rebels?'

We once had a 'rebel,' Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. He too had whipped up angst against the Punjabis just before East Pakistan broke away. I lived in Chittagong then and loved to stroll around New Market looking for pink pearls and kanjeevaram saris. Not only did I stop going when we heard incidents of stabbings at shops, was sent back to Karachi on the next flight out. The Mukti Bahini (Freedom Fighters) struck terror by kidnapping West Pakistani officers and torturing them to death. It was gruesome. When the PPP swept the polls in 1970 and the battle for power between Sheikh Mujib and Bhutto raged, a team was sent to Dhaka to fly the incarcerated Mujib back to Pindi with clear instructions: eliminate Mujib should India intercept their flight. "Under no condition should Indians get Mujib alive," was the bottom line.

Forty years today, a senior officer who met Mujib when he was in jail at Dhaka tells me a fact that is bone chilling. "Do me a favour" Mujib told the officer one day, "arrange a 30-minute meeting between Bhutto, Yahya and myself. Let the three of us debate as to who is breaking up Pakistan. You be the judge." I wait for the officer's next sentence. Without a blink, he tells me it was not Mujib but Bhutto and Yahya who inflamed the fires of 1971 war that led to the breakup of Pakistan!

"You can give up women; you can give up alcohol; you can give up smoking; you can give up gambling, but the one addiction you can never give up is power. It's a devi that sits on your lap!" says the officer and quotes the Mughal emperors who imprisoned/killed their fathers/brothers and all other male relatives competing for the throne.

The destiny of Pakistan has been shaped by a claque of megalomaniacs. They have inflicted a thousand cuts on the constitution, economy, foreign policy, civil service, law and order, religion, human rights, health and education. It's a small miracle that Pakistan has survived. But now with thugs like the Taliban, seditionists like the Baloch emigre, jihadis of south Punjab and militant political parties involved in target killings in Karachi, the state is fast losing its grip. To top this, 18 countries have appointed special envoys for Pakistan. These nosy parkers descend upon us daily to show the mirror to our leaders who perhaps are wearing blinkers and cannot see the writing on the wall. Added to this perversity are newspapers like Washington Post and New York Times shouting 'disaster ahoy!' Pakistan is breaking! "The channels here show Pakistan's invasion of the Taliban all the time," a Pakistani living in the US tells me.

The American screams get louder. Read April 26's New York Times editorial which berates Asif Zardari, Nawaz Sharif and General Kayani in one breath. Are then our leaders asleep at the wheel or has the rest of the world gone crazy with worry about Pakistan?

General Kayani spoke and the Taliban left with their tails between their legs in Buner, so we're told. Does this mean that unless the army chief brandishes his stick in the air, the militants don't listen to any lesser human? While we wish our soldiers Godspeed, we need to be alert to the criticism creeping out from the west regarding Pakistan's weakness to fight the extremists. Our army chief has rightly denounced the hand-wringing while the GHQ has castigated America and Britain for casting aspersions on the ISI. But such sentiment is ephemeral, it quickly vanishes. If history has taught us any lesson then we must watch what's happening around us with eyes wide open. Don't forget generals Yahya and 'Tiger' Niazi. They told us all was well in East Pakistan; the insurgency was under control. Both were intoxicated with power, women and wine. Still we believed them. We also took Bhutto's words as gospel truth, never questioning his oft-quoted sentence idhar hum, udhar tum. If this is not the seed of sedition, what then is it?

The army and the ISI have been tools in the hands of civilian prime ministers and dictators like Ayub, Zia and Musharraf. Notorious names like Brigadier Imtiaz and Major Amir have sullied the ISI with operations like the 'Midnight Jackal'. Zardari is said to have offered Major Amir the post of head of Intelligence Bureau (IB). "I told the people, close to President Zardari, that I am comfortable in my own affairs and thanked them for offering me different assignments," Maj Amir was quoted in this newspaper recently. Our rulers' fascination and need for such shady characters is bottomless. Still, we always criticise our civilian leadership but give a pass to our faujis. Why? Should one assume that all the army chiefs and the ISI heads have been angels with the exception of Aslam Beg, Hameed Gul and Asad Durrani? The three have received enough brickbats. Leave them alone. What about the rest? What was the ISI doing – given that its headquarters are a stone's throw – as the clerics at Lal Masjid built a virtual arms depot in the mosque's premises? Why did one ISI chief — in the early 90s show a 'soft corner' for the US at the cost of national interest? One day I saw him with his family at a car showroom buying the most expensive car standing there.

If a journalist like Nazeer Naji acquires another plot or a bureaucrat has one too many plots, the grunts in the media get loud. Not a tweet from the press on the number of homes/plots/farmhouses our military men, air force and navy, own. Why quarantine us?" says a retired defence officer. Instead, the ruling party and its coalition partner in Peshawar fatuously cling to their alter egos, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Bacha Khan, reminding us of the awesome legacy the two parties have inherited. Sure, but let's talk of today, not yesterday.

If it's any consolation, let me leave you with a thought: Indira Gandhi whose Congress party may win in India would allegedly receive briefcase full of US dollars from her ministers, including her foreign minister, regularly. More of it another time from my reliable sources.



The writer is a freelance journalist with over twenty years of experience in national and international

Children have learned to tell the difference between the sound of artillery fire and a suicide blast.



BRANDISHING toy guns, dummy rocket launchers and with staves in hand, over 100 hooded children, between five and 12 years, marched in the main bazaar of the Barikot tehsil in Swat shouting full-throated slogans of ‘Long live Tehrik-i-Taliban Swat’.

The children’s protests were aimed at a security barrier that had been set up on the road linking the district’s main town of Mingora to a nearby village. Hundreds of people went past indifferently, but as a visitor I was taken aback. I had never seen such a protest in the valley before.

One can hardly draw a parallel, but the children’s protest in Swat seemed eerily reminiscent of scenes of 13th century Europe during the Crusades. At that time, the religious frenzy had affected even children. Thousands of them, many not even in their teens, had amassed in France and Germany to proceed to Jerusalem. The extremist tendencies died down when a majority of them perished en route to the holy city while others ended up as slaves in Egypt. Historians remember this lost generation as ‘minor prophets’ — the products of medieval society’s fanatical religiosity.

Today children in the NWFP and Fata are under the spell of increasing Talibanisation — which is a frightening sign that the country’s northwest has already been lost to militancy and extremism. This is an incalculable price no nation can afford to pay as it turns itself into a front-line state in a war which many perceive as being fought less for a just cause and more for the monetary remuneration it brings.

In Swat, children have gone through tremendous suffering during the last two years of bloodshed. With their young minds gripped by the rhetoric of terror-spewing clerics and their schools serving as the security forces’ bunkers, children have been left to count the sorties of gunship helicopters. They have learned to differentiate between the sound of artillery fire from a mortar attack and the blast generated by the teenage suicide bomber, who until he blew himself up, had been living down the street. Prolonged curfews have limited their view to family courtyards and given them an idea for a new game ‘curfew curfew’, in which riding their bikes, they circumvent mock security barriers to reach a given destination within a specified time.

While standing under an apricot tree in the Charbagh area in the outskirts of Mingora and looking on as militants released 50 security men captured last year, I asked a skinny 10-year-old his name. Without looking at me, he replied, ‘Rehmanullah.’ He was the youngest of four brothers and was studying in fourth grade. His father, he said, was a farmer and could not meet his family’s expenses. Three brothers had joined the militants of hard-line cleric Maulana Fazlullah. Still it came as a shock when Rehmanullah indicated his career choice. He too wanted to become a Talib.

Under these circumstances, it is quite natural for many parents in Swat to be disturbed. They narrate horrible tales of children who have developed the vocabulary of warriors and professional soldiers. Some children disappeared, with their parents getting to know after many years of searching for them that they had been turned into suicide bombers, leaving behind not even an organ to be buried according to rites in the ancestral graveyard. The problems are accumulating — especially for thousands of families where the male members are abroad to earn a livelihood and not home to keep an eye on their sons.

The militarisation of young minds is growing with the release of four jihadi CDs, in which terror is packaged for the consumption of teenage boys in the form of interviews with young suicide bombers and horrible displays of decapitations. Small children pushing handcarts sell such CDs in Mingora. The young vendors say that the videos have high sales in the target group — the youth. The efforts of four students of Khyber Medical College help to place this phenomenon in a wider perspective. These students have completed a study covering 12 schools in relatively peaceful Peshawar to assess the psychological impact of suicide bombing on children between 12 and 15 years.The survey had 15 questions.

The findings revealed that 80 per cent of the students were aware of the nature and purpose of suicide bombings and eight per cent showed a readiness to carry out suicide attacks themselves — though not necessarily for ideological reasons — saying that such attacks were part of the solution and not of the problem. Eight per cent admitted to having witnessed bombing scenes, while 22 per cent had seen their relatives fall victim to such attacks.Twelve per cent were reluctant to attend schools, while 69 per cent said they avoided visiting public places for fear of attacks. It is pointed out that the militancy brew consists of disorientation — resulting from a feeling of uprootedness among the internally displaced — and indoctrination.

Dislocated youth qualify more readily than other segments of society. The last four years of confrontation in the NWFP and Fata have seen major disruptions in normal routines. Militancy and military operations have dented the social order and caused distrust of the state and its institutions. No surprise that this chaos has caused subversive elements to successfully indoctrinate youth who have lost their sense of direction. Thus, in militancy-hit areas youngsters between 12 and 18 years of age are the most vulnerable group to fall into the Taliban’s subversive net.

Eleven camps set up for the internally displaced at different places in the NWFP provide a valuable insight into the impact of conflict on dislocated children. Out of 100,000 residents of camps, children comprise 60 per cent of the total IDP population. Some children show signs of such passivity that it borders on phobia, while others suffer from irritability, restlessness and, above all, aggression.

There are the traumatised ones who lie in their tents all day long and weep sporadically. Jets are the most dreaded objects and make them cry while running for cover. Child-friendly spaces arranged by NGOs inside the camps are needed corners where children receive psychiatric treatment. However, those looking after the children here say that flashbacks of the violence they have experienced haunt them; this is also reflected in their paintings and sketches.

In a country, where militancy is institutionalised and terror is romanticised —as Talibanisation is — it is easy to see that enough raw material is available to fuel the terror industry that thrives on brutality. Militancy is not only haunting our present, it has infested our future as well.

What Pakistan will get from World Econmoic Forum?

I am frustrated at the core. I am not frustrated because I don’t have a well paying job. I am not frustrated because I am suffering through hours of power and gas load-shedding. I am not frustrated because I have to stand up in long lines for hours to get the flour and other food items. I am not frustrated because I have to bear the pain of suicide bombings and bomb blasts.

I am frustrated because still our President thinks that Pakistan doesn’t really need democracy and human rights. He is shocked at why in the world the Europe is obsessed and immersed and dipped and wallowed in democracy, and we are shocked that why in the world we the hapless Pakistanis are being denied basic human rights and democracy?

I am ill at ease really. It seems that only the nation is worried, and our rulers aren’t. They still think that everything is fine, and the streams of honey and milk are flowing across the country from Karachi to Khyber. Does the world leaders in Davos know what “atta shortage” is? Will they marvel as how a country could yearn for roti, while having the bumper crop? Will they discuss the basic necessities of third world country, or will they just screw the concepts for five days in that wretched eastern town of Switzerland?

Pakistan Got Israeli Weapons During Afghan War

WASHINGTON -- Most of the Afghan war against the Soviet Union was fought using Israeli arms supplied after General Ziaul Haq entered into secret deals with Tel Aviv, says a recently published book, Charlie Wilson s War: The Extraordinary Story of the Largest Covert Operation in History.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0871138549/103-7082782-0910238?v=glance
The book reveals that the Pakistan Army was not averse to secret defence cooperation with Israel, although it did not acknowledge any contact with that country publicly. Congressman Charles Wilson a pro-Pakistan activist and the central figure to get CIA-funded weapons for Pakistan is credited in the 550-page book as the man who broke up the Soviet Union with the help of a 48-year old Houston woman whom General Ziaul Haq fancied .
The book claims that Wilson asked Zia to deal with the Israelis during his first visit to US after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The proposal was made at a grand dinner hosted by the Houston lady, Joanne Herring, who was later named as Honorary Consul of Pakistan.
The book says that Charlie Wilson informed Zia the Israelis had shown him the vast stores of Soviet weapons they had captured from the PLO in Lebanon . The weapons were perfect for the mujahideen. If Wilson could convince the CIA to buy them, would Zia have any problems passing them on to the Afghans? Zia, ever the pragmatist, smiled, saying, Just don t put any Stars of David on the boxes .
With that encouragement, the narrative goes on, Wilson pushed on. Just the previous month, he had learned that the Israelis were secretly upgrading the Chinese army s Russian-designed T-55 tanks. In Islamabad, he had been startled to see that the Chinese were supplying Pakistan with T-55s. The congressman now proposed that Zia enter into a similar secret arrangement with the Israelis.
It was no simple proposition. Three years earlier, a mere rumor that Israel had been involved in an attack on the Great Mosque in Mecca had so radicalized the Pakistani Muslim population that thousands had stormed the US embassy in Pakistan and burned it to the ground. Zia was mindful of his people s hatred for both Israel and the United States [but] he encouraged Wilson to continue.
The Congressman cut the Pak-Israel deal even without CIA knowledge . The CIA man in Islamabad, Howard Hart, when asked years later, if he knew about Wilson s efforts to bring the Israelis into the Afghan war, dismissed the story out of hand, insisting that the Pakistanis would never have permitted it. Yet, an astonishing collection of weapons was developed for the Afghan war in no time. The Spanish mortar, for example, was designed to make it possible for the mujahideen to communicate directly with American navigation satellites to deliver repeated rounds within inches of their designated targets.
The weapon s name was chosen to conceal the fact that major portions of the gun were being built by the Israelis, claims the book.
It was decided that a new weapon would be introduced into the battle every three months or so, in order to bluff the Red Army into thinking their enemy was better armed and supported than it was.
The book has been selling well in the USA but is still not available in Pakistan.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_20-7-2003_pg1_4